Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A95
Motherboard	MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A95) (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '18 at 07:20
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 174 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 583 57% 469 Pts	64-Core 784 48% 784 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Lighting 73.7 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 62.4 60% 69.2 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 69.4 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 312 312 306 307 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,596 Write 1,419 Mixed 1,037 SusWrite 337 244% 1,097 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 45.5 146% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 944 DQ Write 673 DQ Mixed 830 614% 816 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 280%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 204 189 191 198 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 204 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 196 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.2 503% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 110%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 93 76 78 103 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 125 Write 54 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 89.1 50% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 187% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 15 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 14.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 99.2 40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	15x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $796

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16