Fujitsu CELSIUS W570

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W570 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3517-A1
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '18 at 07:49
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 1,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 178 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 425 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 583 36% 583 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W2100 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 2120) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 8.04 Parallax 8.03 5% 7.57 fps	MRender 7.67 Gravity 5.57 Splatting 8.04 6% 7.09 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000NX0313 1TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 818GB free (System drive) Firmware: SNA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 43 59 66 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 83.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 57.4 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 20.4 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W570 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W570

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	14x
Xeon E3-1245 v6IntelBench 82%, 562 samples	8x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	16x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	5x
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	4x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	4x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	3x
100_MTFDDAK512TB 512GBMicron_1Bench 80%, 29 samples	3x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	6x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	3x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16