| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16 (all builds) |
| Memory | 28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180411 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 29 '18 at 03:10 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
73.7%
Very good
|
68% 114 Pts
|
58% 486 Pts
|
102% 1,657 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
9.73%
Terrible
|
9% 11 fps
|
11% 13.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 45 54 54 55 56 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
39% 175 MB/s
|
82% 27.6 MB/s
|
108% 159 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MK6476GS 640GB
585GB free
Firmware: 1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
46% 63 MB/s
|
107% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
389GB free
Firmware: YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 87 87 89 90 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
61% 82.8 MB/s
|
102% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
56% 71.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 14x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 4x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $170 |