Today's hottest deals

Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150115
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 01:03
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 506
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 31.8
29% 30.8 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 31.6
28% 34 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MGTE 361GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 12 38 79 52 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 464
Write 397
Mixed 341
SusWrite 96.1
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 0.9
43% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 1
16% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung 830 Series 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 98 98 98 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 323
Write 266
Mixed 213
SusWrite 99.7
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 14.9
58% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 57.5
DQ Write 49.2
DQ Mixed 56.1
41% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$90
34GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 145 151 149 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 86.3
Write 75.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 148
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
430% 3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
50GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 98 98 98 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 24.9
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 99.7
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback