Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090805
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '18 at 20:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 67.6 44% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 125 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.9% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 46.5 29% 37.3 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 31 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 23GB free Firmware: KF100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 73.4 Write 69.2 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 20.6 33% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 53%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: KF100-06 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31.5 Write 72.3 Mixed 19 30% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 53%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 12.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 12.1 16% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

SSD
R5SL120G 120GBBench 62%, 596 samples	3x
BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GBSeagateBench 151%, 3,172 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $142

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16