bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1702 x 1002 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 12:43
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E7- 2830
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
Memory 48
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 102
34% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 27GB
25GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 78 76 64 66 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 196
Write 135
Mixed 163
SusWrite 70.1
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.4
594% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 77%
Virtual HD 113GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 65 69 73 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.1% Very good
Read 196
Write 131
Mixed 212
SusWrite 63.8
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.6
612% 3.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
3968, 128 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback