bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 15:34
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K
None, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 68
2-Core 123
51% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 543
44% 383 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 107GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 0.1
0% 0.62 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 100%
Virtual HD 27GB
6GB free
Firmware: 1.1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 0.5
1% 1.65 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 77%
Virtual HD 27GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1.1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 5
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.5
2% 2.45 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 77%
Msft Virtual Disk 136GB
121GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 1.8
Mixed 11
SusWrite 0.4
4% 5.42 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 88%
Msft Virtual Disk 107GB
83GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 0.5
1% 1.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 91%
Msft Virtual Disk 107GB
79GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 17 17 16 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 65.2
Write 23.1
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 17.9
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
3968, 8320 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 45.9
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 107%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback