| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8C WS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140417 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 16 '18 at 16:10 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76%
Very good
|
73% 124 Pts
|
48% 355 Pts
|
22% 356 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
14% 16.9 fps
|
16% 19.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 327 321 310 304 311 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
101% 458 MB/s
|
139% 48.3 MB/s
|
216% 314 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 139 139 140 138 MB/s
|
78.9%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
182% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
Adaptec Array 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 125 122 124 125 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
93% 128 MB/s
|
187% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
48.5%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
60% 67 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8C WS Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8C WS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 10x |
| Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples | 7x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 4x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples | 3x |
| TS128GSSD340K 128GBTranscendBench 72%, 245 samples | 3x |
| 330 Series 180GBIntelBench 69%, 5,848 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $511 |