Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 833
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 55.8
28% 51.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 48.9
42% 51.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 635 618 632 633 638 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,730
Write 1,426
Mixed 689
SusWrite 744
255% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 62.3
227% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 824
696% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 234%
Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
126GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 147 107 103 92 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 467
Write 446
Mixed 166
SusWrite 130
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 29.8
126% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 135
123% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 88%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$209
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 121 123 124 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 71
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70%
Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
569GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 75.2
Write 75
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 109
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
183GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 151 146 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 149
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 47.6
MC Mixed 37.6
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback