HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110610
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '18 at 05:45
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 345 37% 296 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.04 3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gainward YH0120A 120GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8201d04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 113 114 127 124 140 MB/s Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.6% Below average	Read 209 Write 88.3 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 115 27% 124 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 16.9 64% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 62.4 DQ Write 52.8 DQ Mixed 44.4 37% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 63%
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 294GB free Firmware: 02.03B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 111 111 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 66 SusWrite 110 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B1G73EB0-YK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73DB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 66GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.8% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	536x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	489x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16