Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 11:56
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 310
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 198E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gainward(10B0 0F00) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.9
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.6
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 310 301 302 302 303 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Elements 1TB
406GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 54.4
Write 33.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 34.7
47% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 9905403-577.A00G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT Builds (Compare 591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback