Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 09:21
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 176
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 545
51% 422 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB; Palit StormX GTX 1060 6Gb
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 72
59% 72.8 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 456
Mixed 341
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
183GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 87 86 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 132
Write 114
Mixed 104
SusWrite 85.9
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 79%
silicon-power 4GB
3GB free, PID 3623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.5 6.3 6.2 6.2 5.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.9
11% 9.95 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
39% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Pro4 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback