Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171121
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 232
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 907
80% 682 Pts
64-Core 2,412
149% 2,412 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 391.58
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 131
Parallax 124
108% 129 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 125
Splatting 100
89% 110 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 548 543 537 524 516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1,753
Mixed 757
SusWrite 582
275% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.3
169% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 251
183% 238 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 172%
Great: 254%
Intel SSDPEDMW012T4 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 8EV10171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1151 1150 1152 1150 1148 1150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 856
Write 1,024
Mixed 568
SusWrite 1,150
203% 899 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 48.5
178% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 253
189% 250 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 170%
Great: 250%
HPT DISK 0_0 40TB
22.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 386 387 389 386 389 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
Read 331
Write 303
Mixed 195
SusWrite 386
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 5.5
32% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 6.3
7% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$179
261GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 109
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
450% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
534GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 75.5
Write 72.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 71.8
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
30GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 65
Mixed 43
SusWrite 65.9
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 48.9
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 128%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback