Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 29 '18 at 09:46
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 154
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 246
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.13019.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 49.3
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 34
Splatting 41.1
30% 35.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
78GB free
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 96 105 122 114 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 414
Write 211
Mixed 226
SusWrite 127
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 24.6
89% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 49
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 62.4
68% 108 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
990GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 122 139 144 146 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 102
Write 144
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 137
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
355% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 110%
Amd-raid Array 2 639GB
380GB free
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 13
Write 21.2
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 23.9
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 103%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 2TB
25GB free, PID 50a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 14
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 35.4
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 60%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 1.7
7% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C11-4G F3-17000CL11- F3-2400C11-4G F3-17000CL11- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 14.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback