Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121127
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '18 at 09:49
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 83.7 37% 60 Pts	4-Core 94.4 8-Core 118 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M 3,213 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C581) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 267.54 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.52 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2 2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 113 84 193 196 187 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.8% Average	Read 221 Write 184 Mixed 162 SusWrite 161 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 18.2 60% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 119 96% 134 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 124%
JMicron Generic 1TB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 806GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 16 24 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.88% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 11.1 Mixed 12 SusWrite 21.8 20% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.88% Great: 145%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 3,958 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 12GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 5.9 4.9 0.6 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.24% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 12.2 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 3.6 16% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.8 112% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.24% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 8.1 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	54x
Pentium P6200IntelBench 36%, 8,041 samples	36x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	31x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	131x
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	35x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	10x
M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GBSamsungBench 19%, 426 samples	7x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	6x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16