Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5482 298 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 85.5 41% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 135 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 807GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 218 215 208 207 212 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.2% Good	Read 216 Write 211 Mixed 200 SusWrite 206 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 37 119% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 48.4 39% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 130 127 128 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 126 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples	98x
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	22x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	11x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	11x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $388

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16