Today's hottest deals

MSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A70
MotherboardMSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70)  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 23:38
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 131
60% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 265
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 74.3
66% 79.6 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 66
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JTRA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 435
Mixed 408
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 40.8
133% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 241
190% 267 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 107%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
240GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 68
SusWrite 106
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
739GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 14 14 10 9.4 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 29.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 12.8
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
552GB free
Firmware: 0002DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 52
SusWrite 108
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
118GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 75 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 71.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 75.3
84% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 46%
WL4000GS A6472E 4TB
992GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23% Poor
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 0.3
90% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23%
Great: 66%
WL4000GS A6472E 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 75 75 75 76 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 103
SusWrite 76
154% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 66%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
346GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 1.5 0.6 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 64.7
Write 66.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 1
56% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70) Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback