Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 125
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 285
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 71
Parallax 90.2
55% 76.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 58.2
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 61 54 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 358
Write 55.5
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 53.5
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 32
101% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 63.6
DQ Mixed 29.5
25% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 71 58 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 57.5
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.5
432% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
377GB free
Firmware: 1AA01107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.2
Write 88.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 75.3
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
131GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 1.6 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 67.2
Write 67
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 1.2
60% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
930GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 118
Write 65
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 94.4
110% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
WDC WD50 02ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
438GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 95 96 95 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
Read 110
Write 115
Mixed 74
SusWrite 93.1
132% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 44%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
52GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 3.2 1.1 0.6 0.9 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 247
Write 208
Mixed 204
SusWrite 4.2
208% 166 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 17.8
1,459% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 33.9
DQ Mixed 23.8
2,043% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 112%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback