Asrock X299 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180719
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 76.9 1-Core 149 2-Core 294 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 600 8-Core 1,157 104% 878 Pts	64-Core 2,031 126% 2,031 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB; Palit RTX2080 Super JetStream CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 170 Parallax 167 145% 172 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 147 Splatting 111 116% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 1109 1202 1223 1213 1204 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	338% Outstanding	Read 3,378 Write 2,980 Mixed 1,721 SusWrite 1,173 516% 2,313 MB/s	4K Read 52 4K Write 235 4K Mixed 75.1 299% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 754 DQ Mixed 835 640% 875 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 338% Great: 445%
Adata SU650 480GB-$89 17,796 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 294GB free Firmware: V8X01c31 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 259 272 270 272 271 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 320 Write 307 Mixed 280 SusWrite 264 66% 292 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 26.2 93% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 162 120% 155 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 99%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 136GB free Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1341 1393 1362 1374 1392 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,998 Write 1,411 Mixed 882 SusWrite 1,341 314% 1,408 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 62.3 245% 95.4 MB/s	DQ Read 47.1 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 273 190% 226 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB 1,740 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 205GB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 201 197 225 224 244 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 258 Write 137 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 214 122% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1.1 244% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 262%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 186 191 191 190 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 89GB free Firmware: AX0P2D SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 63 62 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38% Below average	Read 70.7 Write 71.7 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 61.7 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 62%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$74 2,177 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 160GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 80 80 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47% Average	Read 84 Write 82 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 79 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 187 187 186 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 151 Mixed 83 SusWrite 184 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 17.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 10.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Taichi Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	42x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	17x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $179Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	11x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16