Biostar A320MH PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 12:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 195
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 711
66% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 37.9
36% 38 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKS ADROIT 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 254 252 256 231 259 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 484
Write 259
Mixed 271
SusWrite 250
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 33.2
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 178
154% 227 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 81%
Apacer AS330 120GB
60GB free
Firmware: AP122PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 85 92 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 485
Write 457
Mixed 358
SusWrite 117
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 33.3
119% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 178
177% 281 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
638GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 145 146 147 148 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 152
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 147
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK4GX4M1A2400C14 Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback