MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A54
MotherboardMSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 10:37
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$107
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 687
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 61.3
54% 65.2 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63
Splatting 58.6
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 423 418 462 449 449 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 678
Write 543
Mixed 570
SusWrite 426
124% 554 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 55.8
160% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 521
DQ Mixed 581
441% 598 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 131%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
146GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 325 325 355 347 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 457
Mixed 371
SusWrite 329
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 49.5
160% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 348
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
222GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 229 168 165 231 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 479
Write 455
Mixed 388
SusWrite 205
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 32.3
117% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 196
186% 290 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 101%
USB3.0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 106 115 119 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
Read 176
Write 176
Mixed 85
SusWrite 111
179% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 68%
USB3.0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 106 115 119 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
Read 169
Write 182
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 111
177% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
146% 1.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54) Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A TOMAHAWK (MS-7A54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback