Asrock X99 WS-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS-E  (all builds)
Memory108.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 22:51
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 183
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 731
64% 546 Pts
64-Core 2,527
156% 2,527 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 67
Reflection 128
Parallax 170
55% 122 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 184
Splatting 123
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
743GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 414 350 349 351 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 462
Mixed 400
SusWrite 371
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 55.3
181% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 269
202% 270 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$243
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 93 194 194 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 160
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 164
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.2
311% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 110%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 32TB
17.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 1.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 21.8
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.7
1,085% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 151%
Great: 160%
H/W RAID50 16TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0958
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 208 207 203 212 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 170
Mixed 64
SusWrite 207
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
USB3.0 8TB
1TB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 121 123 128 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.5% Good
Read 173
Write 172
Mixed 72
SusWrite 123
176% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1
220% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 9905625-074.A00G 9905625-075.A00G 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
135% Outstanding
MC Read 60.7
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 50.5
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS-E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback