| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151103 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 30 '18 at 13:35 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 73% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.7%
Average
|
40% 61.9 Pts
|
18% 134 Pts
|
10% 157 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
17% 19.8 fps
|
17% 20.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 68 44 66 59 65 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
47% 64.2 MB/s
|
90% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ 8GB
800, 933 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
20.4%
Poor
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
10% 3.4 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 331 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 157x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 46x |
| FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |