Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 58.3 2-Core 125 55% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 370 36% 298 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.8% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 38.6 27% 36.7 fps	MRender 35.7 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 26.1 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 32 31 64 77 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 32.7 Write 62.2 Mixed 8 SusWrite 44.9 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ 8GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 7.4 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	148x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	113x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	94x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	192x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	82x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158