ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion E7424 MD60650

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion E7424 MD60650 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION D17KUN
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180320
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '18 at 01:43
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100U 37,239 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 130 59% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 211 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 22C4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6326 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.33 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 6.12 5% 7.28 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 13.2 8% 9.04 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 110 104 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 381 Write 95.7 Mixed 103 SusWrite 108 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 14.2 56% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 16 29% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 70%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB 4,004 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 95 98 99 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 80.1 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 98.2 64% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback