HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C8
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 15:12
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 62.6
34% 51.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 118
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 80C8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 3.53
2% 3.8 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 450
Write 319
Mixed 329
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 10.9
61% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 26.2
24% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback