HP Z220 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z220 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1791
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 09 '18 at 21:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 331
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.84
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0909
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 241
Mixed 245
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 13.7
72% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 92.2
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 23.1
39% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 69%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
929GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 99
Write 51.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 104
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z220 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback