Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 142 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 390 37% 308 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P3000 729 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 3561) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 600GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 44 70 74 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 14.2 Write 40.2 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 52.4 22% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-PB 2x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.8% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	28x
HD Graphics P3000IntelBench 2%, 729 samples	9x
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	3x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 3 samples	3x
PSD34G133381 8502 PSD34G13332 8GBUnknownBench 43%, 15 samples	3x
8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 4x2GBMicronBench 59%, 855 samples	2x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100