Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141121
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 12:11
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 450
62% 460 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 40.5
39% 44.5 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 36.4
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 79 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 146
Write 113
Mixed 136
SusWrite 79.2
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 29
127% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 92.8
77% 111 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
262GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 132 133 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 103
Mixed 73
SusWrite 132
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
143GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 65.2
Write 69.6
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 110
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GLK64W6H 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback