Today's hottest deals

Asus G55VW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G55VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G55VW
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 07:12
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 409
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2117) 2GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.32 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 12
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,277
Write 3,700
Mixed 3,486
851% 3,821 MB/s
4K Read 220
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 125
554% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 356
271% 372 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 322GB
161GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 59 61 64 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 63.2
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 62.7
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 5.4
967% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G55VW Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G55VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback