Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '18 at 16:11
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 240 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 830 79% 654 Pts	64-Core 1,304 81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2562 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 153 Parallax 140 113% 144 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 147 Splatting 116 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 88 215 270 275 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,030 Write 1311 Mixed 952 SusWrite 392 207% 921 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 60.5 216% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 896 DQ Write 881 DQ Mixed 922 684% 900 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 302 301 302 301 302 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 481 Mixed 406 SusWrite 320 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 58.8 186% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 358 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 106GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 320 320 319 309 317 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 398 Write 325 Mixed 188 SusWrite 316 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 16.1 69% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 46 50% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 61%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 165 168 169 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 176 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 167 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 336 335 332 334 335 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX F4-2400C16-8GFX F4-2133C15-8GFX 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 32 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 35.7 SC Mixed 28.4 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $701

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)