MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7996
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '18 at 20:24
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 32.9 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 156 50% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 328 40% 306 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22D2) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 25.7 15% 24 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 31 21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 133 140 161 156 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 151 Write 143 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 144 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 30GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 3.7 8.4 4.4 1.2 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.57% Terrible	Read 31.3 Write 17.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 6.8 24% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.9 108% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 1x8GB 773 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 2,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	518x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	345x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	341x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	432x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	341x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	237x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	142x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	43x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16