Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '18 at 14:06
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 89.5 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 176 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 848F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.26 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600A SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 71 71 65 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 162 Write 89.2 Mixed 130 SusWrite 71.5 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 18.8 66% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 44.1 DQ Write 26.9 DQ Mixed 31.5 25% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 73%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB 2,495 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 122GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 67 69 68 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 27.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 67 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 44%
Samsung SSD 850 250GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 100GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 10.8 Write 24 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 25.3 22% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 2.5 345% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 1x4GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 7.9 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	301x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $294

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16