Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '18 at 15:47
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 207 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 302 41% 303 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1915 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Lighting 48.9 Reflection 33.1 Parallax 40.5 40% 40.8 fps	MRender 41.4 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 39.3 34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5790 Write 5,081 Mixed 5,190 1,194% 5,354 MB/s	4K Read 230 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 170 649% 185 MB/s	DQ Read 826 DQ Write 706 DQ Mixed 811 595% 781 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB 1,133 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 57GB free Firmware: P0414B SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 98 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 431 Write 301 Mixed 291 SusWrite 104 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 32.8 113% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 64.4 DQ Mixed 94.6 77% 113 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 113%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 324GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 34.3 Write 36 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 37.1 46% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D4U2400M/8G 1315 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.9% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 24.2 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 24.5 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-DGS R3.0 Builds (Compare 1,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	215x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	106x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	213x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	24x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 1x8GBUnknownBench 36%, 2,477 samples	29x
UDIMM DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBCrucial $29Bench 41%, 2,562 samples	20x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16