Virtuozzo KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVirtuozzo KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '18 at 19:38
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 2 Duo P9xxx (Penryn Class Core 2)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
Memory 51.3
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 65.9
34% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 47.1
8-Core 103
9% 75.1 Pts
64-Core 153
9% 153 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 45.4
Write 21.1
Mixed 34.9
8% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
3% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
9GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 52.4
Write 45.7
Mixed 22.9
9% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.1
5% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 55%
Qemu HARDDISK 32GB
6GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 84.2
Write 66
Mixed 87.9
18% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 5.4
19% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
Red Hat VirtIO 21GB
20GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 81.2
Mixed 44.7
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback