Virtuozzo KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVirtuozzo KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 30 '22 at 03:57
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon (Cascadelake)
CPU 0, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 160
54% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 453
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu Virtuozzo HDD0 268GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 130 153 221 207 199 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
Read 421
Write 262
Mixed 321
SusWrite 177
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 11.2
47% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 187
128% 156 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 30.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback