Acer Veriton X2611G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton X2611G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X2611G
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 11:29
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 488
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON HD5450
Sapphire(174B A007) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 2.25
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 1.91
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 127 98 96 86 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 132
Write 76.7
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 97.3
20% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.9
30% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
319GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 129
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X2611G Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X2611G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback