Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJun 24 '16 at 05:50
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 89.8
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 171
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 173
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.34
2% 3.05 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 438
Write 237
Mixed 54.9
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 6.45
32% 9.88 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 8.49
10% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 56%
Dc-324e RAID 5 Set 0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.04
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 151
Write 51.1
Mixed 83
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.62
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.27
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%
Samsung HM250HI 250GB-$50
203GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 67.5
Write 73.3
Mixed 52.2
48% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.38
90% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-043.A00LF 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback