Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer H87M-S01
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 11:23
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 546
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 32.5
29% 31.2 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 32.9
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 285 278 258 272 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 374
Write 323
Mixed 257
SusWrite 273
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 23.5
90% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 146
120% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
794GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 178
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 170
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
796GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 64.7
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60% Good
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 104
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST9640320AS 640GB-$270
522GB free
Firmware: 0004SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 44.8
Write 43.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 84.8
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 7.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 9.5
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.3
151% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 0420 DDR3 1600G Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-S01 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Mousecomputer/7hpr64 H87M-S01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback