Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 05:20
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 235 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 727 73% 593 Pts	64-Core 914 57% 914 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 116 Parallax 107 87% 110 fps	MRender 97.7 Gravity 94 Splatting 101 80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 86GB free Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 300 326 304 300 336 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 332 Write 343 Mixed 311 SusWrite 312 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 44 159% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 515 346% 417 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 230%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 418 424 383 372 410 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,893 Write 1,038 Mixed 801 SusWrite 430 230% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 61 204% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 609 DQ Mixed 765 561% 738 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 363%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 86GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 111 103 102 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 110 Write 87.2 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 107 67% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$125 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 725GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 145 133 131 147 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 126 Write 111 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 138 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$125 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 124 115 112 125 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 152 Write 115 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 118 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$125 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 121 110 108 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 119 Write 90 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 114 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 99%
ST3000DM 007-1WY10G 3TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 116 108 102 116 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.4% Average	Read 135 Write 150 Mixed 98 SusWrite 109 166% 123 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 47%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 116 108 102 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 130 Write 130 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 109 153% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 4x8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 44.3 MC Mixed 35.1 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	702x
Core i7-6850KIntel $105Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	196x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	216x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	182x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	111x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	64x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	41x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16