User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardXFX MB-750I-72P9
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '16 at 00:47
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 88.1
43% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 117
21% 149 Pts
64-Core 20.2
1% 20.2 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 16.7
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST5000DM000-1FK1 5TB
448GB free
Firmware: CC44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 131
Mixed 67.8
19% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 0.48
9% 4.89 MB/s
DQ Read 0.98
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.32
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 22%
Seagate ST3000DM001-1E61 3TB
43GB free
Firmware: SC48
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 75
Write 82.8
Mixed 58.4
16% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 7.57
4K Mixed 0.51
6% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 16%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 5.38
Write 86.6
Mixed 71.7
42% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.17
56% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 38.6
Mixed 42.9
30% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.23
59% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB
98GB free
Firmware: CC34
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.1
Write 66.4
Mixed 31.9
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.31
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
88GB free
Firmware: 51.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 76.1
Write 113
Mixed 70.2
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB
63GB free
Firmware: CC95
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 72.1
Write 69.8
Mixed 55.8
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
30GB free
Firmware: CC32
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 66.3
Mixed 25.4
37% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.42
79% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST500LT012-9WS14 500GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 44.8
Mixed 43.4
34% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.19
38% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback