Toshiba Satellite A665

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite A665  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '16 at 23:26
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 54
2-Core 87.8
53% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 209
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Toshiba(1179 FD30) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 257
Write 179
Mixed 183
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 7.7
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 4.46
29% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 97%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 9.22
Mixed 8.89
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.56
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.006
14% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A665 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A665

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback