Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A58
MotherboardMSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 21:23
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 745
79% 629 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 133
Parallax 117
91% 120 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 110
Splatting 103
85% 103 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
817GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1490 1549 1615 1602 1682 1164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,513
Write 1,673
Mixed 1,324
SusWrite 1,517
392% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 89.7
297% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,165
873% 1,166 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 338%
Great: 355%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
71GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,902
Write 1,436
Mixed 694
296% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 54.8
216% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,104
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 690
632% 965 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
HP S700 Pro 128GB-$21
37GB free
Firmware: Q0308A_H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 304 259 209 45 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 382
Mixed 400
SusWrite 214
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.6
166% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 87
108% 182 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
33GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,914
Write 1,434
Mixed 614
290% 1,320 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 54.1
212% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 817
684% 986 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 45 83 104 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 181
Write 143
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 62.3
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 114%
Patriot Memory 127GB
14GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 282
Write 316
Mixed 54.2
261% 217 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 103%
JMicron Generic 256GB
89GB free, PID 0576
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 236 223 223 224 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 392
Mixed 334
SusWrite 253
456% 339 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 34.9
3,274% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 37.6
3,770% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 296%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58) Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $528
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback