PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170X-GamingG1 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180111 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '19 at 01:14 |
Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 854B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 402 361 354 347 356 MB/s
|
142%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
208GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 278 265 293 285 290 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 110 118 112 119 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 141 146 139 148 MB/s
|
84.2%
Excellent
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
447GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 155 158 155 160 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 118x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 18x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 24x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 21x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $828 |