PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150723 |
Uptime | 4.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 06 '19 at 15:45 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 160GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 59 59 63 60 61 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
62GB free
Firmware: JEDOA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 36 34 31 31 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
237GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 35 33 30 31 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown R538G1601U2S-UO000 R538G1601U2S-UO000 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $236 |