| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Lenovo 20238 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO INVALID |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131223 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 09 '19 at 18:11 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.8%
Good
|
60% 93.8 Pts
|
25% 187 Pts
|
12% 189 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380B) 2GB
CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.3
|
4.52%
Terrible
|
4% 6.92 fps
|
5% 5.53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 132 101 94 90 82 MB/s
|
61.5%
Good
|
57% 256 MB/s
|
116% 40.3 MB/s
|
30% 44.8 MB/s
|
|
WDC WD10 JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
498GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 34 35 36 35 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
44% 32.6 MB/s
|
97% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.7%
Above average
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
59% 67.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,009 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Lenovo 20238
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 407x |
| Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 313x |
| Core i3-4000MIntel $259Bench 51%, 7,973 samples | 132x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 951x |
| Radeon R5 M230AMDBench 4%, 157 samples | 12x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $77 |