Notebook N24_25PU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N24_25PU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N24_25PU
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 10:31
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 29
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 37.2
18% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 146
23% 166 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Clevo(1558 2401) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 168 198 184 197 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 336
Write 274
Mixed 197
SusWrite 187
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 18.8
47% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 177
135% 183 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde TEAMGROUP-SD3-1866 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 261
15% 261 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N24_25PU Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Notebook N24_25PU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback