Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '19 at 12:49
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 861 81% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,324 82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.5% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 76.4 Parallax 62.4 54% 68.5 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 86.8 67% 81.2 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 299GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 298 274 265 266 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 502 Write 261 Mixed 262 SusWrite 280 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 26.9 132% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 210 174% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 129%
Samsung NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GB 5,877 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 238GB free Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 990 1043 1063 1052 1045 1096 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1331 Write 1,115 Mixed 741 SusWrite 1,048 237% 1,059 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 58.1 210% 75.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,121 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 576 472% 695 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 247%
AMD T00 StoreMI 4TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2TB free Firmware: 1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.2 4 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 164 Write 166 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 4.2 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 14,300 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 34.9 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 32.1 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16