Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H170 PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160513
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '19 at 01:29
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 215 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 412 52% 394 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.1% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 135 Parallax 116 100% 125 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 126 Splatting 104 92% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 108 108 109 109 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 370 Mixed 380 SusWrite 145 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 51.1 170% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 313 236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 400GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 443 482 482 479 485 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 131%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 21GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 20GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 448 Mixed 386 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 53.9 178% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 311 234% 314 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 45%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 515GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 10 13 17 17 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 471 Write 402 Mixed 121 SusWrite 16.9 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 1.4 15% 5.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.1 DQ Write 9.1 DQ Mixed 3.5 4% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 537GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 43GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 8.9 11 15 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 69.3 Write 40.9 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 13.7 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 859GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 149GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 8.7 11 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 153 Write 162 Mixed 92 SusWrite 13.5 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 193GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 30GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 8.3 11 15 14 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 23.7 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 13.6 15% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 84%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 322GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 158GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 8.4 11 15 16 18 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 159 Write 116 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 21.1 67% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.9% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 25 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 22 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	451x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	365x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	328x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	230x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	213x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	185x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	135x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	123x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	91x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $667

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16