bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 07:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 131
40% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 532
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 87 92 89 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 408
Write 306
Mixed 348
SusWrite 83
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 14.3
48% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 181
123% 147 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 79%
Synology iSCSI Storage 17.5TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 289 275 258 286 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
Read 191
Write 388
Mixed 256
SusWrite 284
64% 280 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 9.5
30% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 69.3
46% 54.1 MB/s
Synology iSCSI Storage 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 287 277 258 284 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
Read 222
Write 374
Mixed 266
SusWrite 283
65% 286 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 8.6
28% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 57.6
41% 51 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 25.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback